Let it all hang out
August 2, 2012 —
In batting around ideas for editorials, we occasionally come across topics that seem to merit support or condemnation, but are nevertheless not good editorial fodder because they seem just too obvious.
One recent idea that initially seemed to us to fall into this category is Sullivan County District 5 legislator Cindy Gieger’s proposal to adopt a resolution prohibiting the discussion of matters of general public concern, rather than just party business, in caucus, as is the current custom. That would mean that legislative matters of concern to the entire county would have to be discussed in public, and in the presence of all nine legislators, not handled in private caucus talks between the seven Democratic legislators and two Republican legislators respectively.
However, to the extent that it is by no means clear that the other legislators will accept Gieger’s proposal, it looks like matters are not quite that simple. So here are some basic arguments in favor of her proposal.
1. The proposal furthers the goals of democratic governance.
• It is in the interests of a democracy for government to be transparent.
• Transparency requires deliberations over legislative decisions to be held in public.
• The caucuses are private.
• Given the huge seven-two Democratic majority, any matter they settle in private, in caucus, is pretty much a shoo-in for the actual vote, leaving little to discuss in the full session.
• Therefore, most of the deliberations happen in private.
• The current system is therefore not transparent, and not in the interests of democracy.
• 2. The current system is unfair to certain Sullivan County citizens.
• In a fair system of government, all citizens should have equal representation in the deliberations of the legislature.
• In a representative rather than direct democracy, that means their representatives should have equal representation in the deliberations of the legislature.
• Districts 3 and 9, including Rockland and parts of the towns of Liberty and Thompson, are represented by minority legislators Alan Sorensen and Kitty Vetter.
• Vetter and Sorensen, as Republicans, are not included in the majority Democratic caucus deliberations.
• Therefore, the current system does not fairly and equally represent the citizens of Sullivan County.
3. It is in the long-term self interest of the Democrats to adopt Gieger’s proposal.
• It is in the long-term interest of the Democrats to make sure that they always have a fair place at the legislative table.